
Accreditation Self-Study
Accreditation Reaffirmation
During the 2027-2028 academic year, Princeton Theological Seminary will be reviewed for an eight-year reaffirmation of accreditation by both of our accrediting bodies, the Association of Theological Schools (ATS) and the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE). Reaffirmation includes two years of researching and authoring self-studies before hosting visiting teams from ATS and MSCHE in the Fall of 2027.
The Self-Study Purpose
Between Spring 2025 and Summer 2027 a Steering Committee will guide research and writing leading to the self-study reports to submit to each of our accreditors. This is an opportunity to engage in reflective self-study in order to grow as a community in fulfillment of our mission to serve students, church, academy, and world. We want all members of the community to be involved and to share their feedback. There will be many opportunities for engagement along the way, but we also welcome your direct feedback!
Submit FeedbackSchedule Overview
-
Spring 2025
-
Community comments
-
Fall 2025 – Spring 2026
-
Research
-
Fall 2026
-
Refine drafts and evidence
-
Spring 2027
-
Community leaders review Self-Study drafts
-
Fall 2027
-
September
Host ATS visiting team
-
November
Host Middle States visiting team
-
Spring 2028
-
Receive visiting team reports
Steering Committee Membership
The Steering Committee provides leadership to the entire Self-Study process. The Committee gives direction to research and writing, ensuring that all constituencies’ voices are represented and that the school is depicted honestly according to our accreditors’ standards.
- Sarah Turnblom, Director of Assessment and Accreditation, Co-Chair and Accreditation Liaison Officer
- Elaine James, Associate Professor of Old Testament, Faculty Co-Chair
- Matt Witkowski, Deputy to the Executive Vice President, Data and Evidence Manager
- Cherrelle Nicholson, Director of Marketing and Integrated Content, Communications Manager
- Katarina Von Kuhn, PhD Student, Self-Study Coordinator
- Dayle Rounds, Assoc. Vice President for Alumni and Church Relations, Leader Working Group 1: Mission, Goals, Ethics, Integrity
- Abigail Rusert, Associate Dean of Continuing Education, Leader Working Group 2: Governance, Administration, and Personnel
- KC Choi, Professor of Asian American Theology, Co-Leader Working Group 3: Operations, Finance, and Institutional Resources
- Jessica Spearnock, Controller, Co-Leader Working Group 3: Operations, Finance, and Institutional Resources
- Joel Estes, Assoc. VP for Strategic Enrollment Management, Leader Working Group 4: Student Support
- Rose Ellen Dunn, Assoc. Dean for Academic Affairs, Leader Working Group 5: Academic Assessment, Faculty, and Institutional Evaluation
- Karen Rohrer, Assoc. Academic Dean, Co-Leader Working Group 6: Academic Programs
- Kelsey Lambright, Digital Learning Designer, Co-Leader Working Group 6: Academic Programs
Working Groups
Working Groups complete the research and writing of the Self-Studies. Each working group has a theme that stretches across standards from both of our accreditors. Groups include representation from faculty and staff. Some group also include a student or Trustee.
Dayle Rounds, Chair
Middle States Standards
I. Mission and Goals
The institution’s mission defines its purpose within the context of higher education, the students it serves, and what it intends to accomplish. The institution’s stated goals are clearly linked to its mission and specify how the institution fulfills its mission.
II. Ethics and Integrity
Ethics and integrity are central, indispensable, and defining hallmarks of effective higher education institutions. In all activities, whether internal or external, an institution must be faithful to its mission, honor its contracts and commitments, adhere to its policies, and represent itself truthfully.
ATS Standards
1. Mission and Integrity
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning guided by theological missions that are achieved with institutional integrity. Schools have missions appropriate to graduate theological education and to their own contexts. Missions are clearly and publicly stated, widely accepted, broadly used, regularly reviewed, and changed as needed. In achieving their missions, schools conduct their activities with institutional integrity, especially in areas related to human interactions, diversity, legal obligations, and Commission responsibilities.
2. Planning and Evaluation
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning guided by institutional visions that inform thoughtful planning grounded in ongoing evaluation. Planning is a mission-guided and broad-based process that focuses on strategic priorities in light of current realities, resulting in a plan that is appropriately resourced, actively implemented, regularly reviewed, and periodically updated. Evaluation is a simple, systematic, and sustained process that helps schools understand how well they are achieving their missions and then helps schools use that information to better achieve their missions, especially regarding student learning and formation.
Abigail Russert, Chair
Middle States Standards
VII: Governance, Leadership, and Administration
The institution is governed and administered in a manner that allows it to realize its stated mission and goals in a way that effectively benefits the institution, its students, and the other constituencies it serves. Even when supported by or affiliated with a related entity, the institution has education as its primary purpose, and it operates as an academic institution with appropriate autonomy.
ATS Standards
1. Mission and Integrity
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning guided by theological missions that are achieved with institutional integrity. Schools have missions appropriate to graduate theological education and to their own contexts. Missions are clearly and publicly stated, widely accepted, broadly used, regularly reviewed, and changed as needed. In achieving their missions, schools conduct their activities with institutional integrity, especially in areas related to human interactions, diversity, legal obligations, and Commission responsibilities.
2. Planning and Evaluation
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning guided by institutional visions that inform thoughtful planning grounded in ongoing evaluation. Planning is a mission-guided and broad-based process that focuses on strategic priorities in light of current realities, resulting in a plan that is appropriately resourced, actively implemented, regularly reviewed, and periodically updated. Evaluation is a simple, systematic, and sustained process that helps schools understand how well they are achieving their missions and then helps schools use that information to better achieve their missions, especially regarding student learning and formation.
KC Choi, Co-Chair
Jessica Spearnock, Co-Chair
Middle States Standards
VI: Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement
The institution’s planning processes, resources, and structures are aligned with each other and are sufficient to fulfill its mission and goals, to continuously assess and improve its programs and services, and to respond effectively to opportunities and challenges.
ATS Standards
2. Planning and Evaluation
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning guided by institutional visions that inform thoughtful planning grounded in ongoing evaluation. Planning is a mission-guided and broad-based process that focuses on strategic priorities in light of current realities, resulting in a plan that is appropriately resourced, actively implemented, regularly reviewed, and periodically updated. Evaluation is a simple, systematic, and sustained process that helps schools understand how well they are achieving their missions and then helps schools use that information to better achieve their missions, especially regarding student learning and formation.
10. Institutional Resources
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning reliant upon sufficient and stable resources to achieve their missions. These resources include human, financial, physical, technological, and shared resources that require faithful and effective stewardship. Schools acquire and use these resources in trust for the fulfillment of their missions in ways that are realistic, holistic, and sustainable. Schools give particular attention to their greatest resource, people, by building communities where all persons are valued, respected, and enabled to use their gifts in ways that serve well the mission.
Joel Estes, Chair
Middle States Standards
IV: Support of the Student Experience
Across all educational experiences, settings, levels, and instructional modalities, the institution recruits and admits students whose interests, abilities, experiences, and goals are congruent with its mission and educational offerings. The institution commits to student retention, persistence, completion, and success through a coherent and effective support system sustained by qualified professionals, which enhances the quality of the learning environment, contributes to the educational experience, and fosters student success.
ATS Standards
6. Library and Information Services
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning grounded in the historical resources of the tradition, the scholarship of the academic disciplines, and the wisdom of communities of practice. Theological libraries are curated collections and instructional centers with librarians guiding research and organizing access to appropriate resources. Libraries and librarians partner with faculty in student learning and formation to serve schools’ educational missions and to equip students to be effective and ethical users of information resources.
7. Student Services
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning with a central focus on students and on serving them well. Student services personnel share responsibility with faculty, administrators, staff, and students themselves for creating the conditions under which students engage appropriately in educationally purposeful activities. Student services personnel help foster supportive learning environments, bridge organizational boundaries, and form collaborative partnerships to enhance student learning and formation. These services contribute to the school’s overall mission and consider the specific needs of students pursuing graduate theological education.
3. Student Learning and Formation
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning centered on student learning and formation. Consistent with their missions and religious identities, theological schools give appropriate attention to the intellectual, human, spiritual, and vocational dimensions of student learning and formation. Schools pursue those dimensions with attention to academic rigor, intercultural competency, global awareness and engagement, and lifelong learning. Schools support student learning and formation through appropriate educational modalities and policies.
Rose Ellen Dunn, Chair
Middle States Standards
V: Educational Effectiveness Assessment
Assessment of student learning and achievement demonstrates that the institution’s students have accomplished educational goals consistent with their program of study, degree level, the institution’s mission, and appropriate expectations for institutions of higher education.
VI: Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement
The institution’s planning processes, resources, and structures are aligned with each other and are sufficient to fulfill its mission and goals, to continuously assess and improve its programs and services, and to respond effectively to opportunities and challenges.
ATS Standards
8. Faculty
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning dependent upon a qualified, supported, and effective faculty of sufficient size and diversity to achieve schools’ educational missions and support student learning and formation. Faculty responsibilities, composition, and qualifications are clearly defined and appropriate to graduate theological education. Faculty are supported and provided ongoing opportunities for professional development. Faculty roles in teaching and learning, scholarship, and service are clear and consistent with schools’ missions and are fulfilled effectively by the faculty.
2. Planning and Evaluation
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning guided by institutional visions that inform thoughtful planning grounded in ongoing evaluation. Planning is a mission-guided and broad-based process that focuses on strategic priorities in light of current realities, resulting in a plan that is appropriately resourced, actively implemented, regularly reviewed, and periodically updated. Evaluation is a simple, systematic, and sustained process that helps schools understand how well they are achieving their missions and then helps schools use that information to better achieve their missions, especially regarding student learning and formation.
4. Master’s Degree Programs
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning offering master’s degrees that are appropriate to their missions, constituencies, and capacities and that meet all applicable degree program requirements. Master’s degrees have clearly stated student learning outcomes that are regularly evaluated, with the results used to improve student learning and formation.
5. Doctoral Degree Programs
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning that may offer doctoral degrees appropriate to their missions, constituencies, and capacities and that meet all applicable degree program requirements. Doctoral degrees have clearly stated student learning outcomes that are regularly evaluated, with the results used to improve student learning and formation.
- Karen Rohrer, Co-Chair
- Kelsey Lambright, Co-Chair
Middle States Standards
III: Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience
An institution provides students with learning experiences that are characterized by rigor and coherence at all program, certificate, and degree levels, regardless of instructional modality. All learning experiences, regardless of modality, program pace/schedule, level, and setting are consistent with higher education expectations.
ATS Standards
3. Student Learning and Formation
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning centered on student learning and formation. Consistent with their missions and religious identities, theological schools give appropriate attention to the intellectual, human, spiritual, and vocational dimensions of student learning and formation. Schools pursue those dimensions with attention to academic rigor, intercultural competency, global awareness and engagement, and lifelong learning. Schools support student learning and formation through appropriate educational modalities and policies.
4. Master’s Degree Programs
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning offering master’s degrees that are appropriate to their missions, constituencies, and capacities and that meet all applicable degree program requirements. Master’s degrees have clearly stated student learning outcomes that are regularly evaluated, with the results used to improve student learning and formation.
5. Doctoral Degree Programs
Theological schools are communities of faith and learning that may offer doctoral degrees appropriate to their missions, constituencies, and capacities and that meet all applicable degree program requirements. Doctoral degrees have clearly stated student learning outcomes that are regularly evaluated, with the results used to improve student learning and formation.
For questions, please email academic.accreditation@ptsem.edu